MUKTI ROY(BARMAN) SUDIP GHOSH CHOWDHURY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/700/2026

Case under West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0018052026

Filing Number

WPA/720/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/700/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKTI ROY(BARMAN) SUDIP GHOSH CHOWDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 700/2026 The High Court at Calcutta directed the Head of Nilkuthi Sister Nivedita Girls High School to consider the petitioner's transfer application dated 6th April 2026 (filed on widow grounds) as per prevailing rules, and if eligible, to take all consequential steps within six weeks. Although the court noted documentary deficiencies (missing date on application, incomplete postal receipt), it accepted the petitioner's sworn statement that she had submitted the transfer request and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/700/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 700/2026 The High Court at Calcutta directed the Head of Nilkuthi Sister Nivedita Girls High School to consider the petitioner's transfer application dated 6th April 2026 (filed on widow grounds) as per prevailing rules, and if eligible, to take all consequential steps within six weeks. Although the court noted documentary deficiencies (missing date on application, incomplete postal receipt), it accepted the petitioner's sworn statement that she had submitted the transfer request and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case