ANITA BARMAN RATAN CHANDRA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/687/2026
Case under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0017922026
Filing Number
WPA/711/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
WPA/687/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Secondary Education Post Retirement ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANITA BARMAN RATAN CHANDRA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER, DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
-
3.THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION, PROVIDENT FUND AND GROUP INSURANCE, WEST BENGAL
-
4.THE DI OF SCHOOLS SE COOCHBEHAR
-
5.THE TREASURY OFFICER, COOCHBEHAR II
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
Case Summary: WPA/687/2026 - Anita Barman v. State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta allowed the petition of retired Assistant Teacher Anita Barman, directing the state to refund Rs. 3,81,496/- deposited in June-July 2025 (just 1-2 months before her August 31, 2025 retirement) plus 8% interest within six weeks. The court held that recovery of allegedly overpaid salary due to erroneous increment fixation was impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (*Rafiq Masih*), which prohibits recovery from employees retiring within one year of the recovery order, as such timing would be harsh and iniquitous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
-
13-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/687/2026
Case Summary: WPA/687/2026 - Anita Barman v. State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta allowed the petition of retired Assistant Teacher Anita Barman, directing the state to refund Rs. 3,81,496/- deposited in June-July 2025 (just 1-2 months before her August 31, 2025 retirement) plus 8% interest within six weeks. The court held that recovery of allegedly overpaid salary due to erroneous increment fixation was impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (*Rafiq Masih*), which prohibits recovery from employees retiring within one year of the recovery order, as such timing would be harsh and iniquitous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts