THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BEDASHRUTI BOSE vs TAPASI ROY AND ORS — FMAT(MV)/36/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section 166. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0016332026

Filing Number

FMAT(MV)/36/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

FMAT(MV)/36/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Motor Accident Claim ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BEDASHRUTI BOSE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAPASI ROY AND ORS

  2. 2.MINATI SUTRADHAR

  3. 3.RATAN SUTRADHAR

  4. 4.SANJIT SARKAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: FMAT(MV) 36/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri directed National Insurance Company Limited to serve copies of the appeal and two interlocutory applications (CAN 1 and CAN 2) on respondents, with the matter to be relisted before the next Circuit. An affidavit of service must be filed on the returnable date, and any procedural defects shall be cured in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Application (Macc)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Application (Macc)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMAT(MV)/36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FMAT(MV) 36/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned. The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri directed National Insurance Company Limited to serve copies of the appeal and two interlocutory applications (CAN 1 and CAN 2) on respondents, with the matter to be relisted before the next Circuit. An affidavit of service must be filed on the returnable date, and any procedural defects shall be cured in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case