NABIN GHOSH AND ANR AJAY SINGHAL vs SARBARI BASU (GHOSH) AND ORS — CRR/142/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act ,2005 Section 29. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0015672026

Filing Number

CRR/144/2026

Filing Date

13-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRR/142/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Residuary matters ( 93 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act ,2005 Section 29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NABIN GHOSH AND ANR AJAY SINGHAL

  2. 2.SHREOSI GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARBARI BASU (GHOSH) AND ORS

  2. 2.BIPLAB BASU

  3. 3.ANIRUDHA BASU

  4. 4.PARTHA SARATHI BASU

  5. 5.GOUTAM BASU

  6. 6.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

    The High Court set aside the appellate court's order restraining property demolition, finding the Sessions Judge erred in setting aside the Magistrate's final order (which had already granted relief to the domestic violence victim) and in confirming an interim demolition restraint order against newly-added parties who were not original respondents in the domestic violence case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Criminal Revision

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

  4. 11-May-2026

    Criminal Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi ChatterjeeView PDF

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court set aside the appellate court's order restraining property demolition, finding the Sessions Judge erred in setting aside the Magistrate's final order (which had already granted relief to the domestic violence victim) and in confirming an interim demolition restraint order against newly-added parties who were not original respondents in the domestic violence case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case