BASANTA ROY KALIPADA DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/99/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0015182026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/98/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/99/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASANTA ROY KALIPADA DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar ManthaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed petitioner Sri Basanta Roy's second bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court rejected the bail plea despite the petitioner being in custody for over 400 days, citing the victim's deposition establishing that the applicant photographed her in compromising positions and blackmailed her. The court directed expeditious trial completion without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/99/2026
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed petitioner Sri Basanta Roy's second bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court rejected the bail plea despite the petitioner being in custody for over 400 days, citing the victim's deposition establishing that the applicant photographed her in compromising positions and blackmailed her. The court directed expeditious trial completion without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts