SUBRATA ARYA@SUBRATA ARJA ABHILASH MITTAL vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/96/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0015122026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th April 2026

Filing Number

CRM(M) /96/2026

Filing Date

08-04-2026

Registration No

CRM(M) /96/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

20th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SUBRATA ARYA@SUBRATA ARJA ABHILASH MITTAL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

XXX

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

13-04-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

20-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed the second bail application of Subrata Arya, who was accused of sexually abusing a child under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court declined bail despite the petitioner being in custody for over 220 days, citing the serious nature of the offence, the breach of trust involved (petitioner being the victim's brother-in-law), and that the charge-sheet had already been filed with trial proceedings commencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed the second bail application of Subrata Arya, who was accused of sexually abusing a child under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court declined bail despite the petitioner being in custody for over 220 days, citing the serious nature of the offence, the breach of trust involved (petitioner being the victim's brother-in-law), and that the charge-sheet had already been filed with trial proceedings commencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case