SUBRATA ARYA@SUBRATA ARJA ABHILASH MITTAL vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/96/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0015122026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/96/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/96/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBRATA ARYA@SUBRATA ARJA ABHILASH MITTAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.XXX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar ManthaView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed the second bail application of Subrata Arya, who was accused of sexually abusing a child under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court declined bail despite the petitioner being in custody for over 220 days, citing the serious nature of the offence, the breach of trust involved (petitioner being the victim's brother-in-law), and that the charge-sheet had already been filed with trial proceedings commencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sugato MajumdarView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Application For Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Sugato Majumdar

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/96/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed the second bail application of Subrata Arya, who was accused of sexually abusing a child under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The court declined bail despite the petitioner being in custody for over 220 days, citing the serious nature of the offence, the breach of trust involved (petitioner being the victim's brother-in-law), and that the charge-sheet had already been filed with trial proceedings commencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case