HARIPADA ROY AND ANR SATYAKI BASU vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(A)/236/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0014652026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

CRM(A) /234/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

CRM(A) /236/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482
Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act Section 6,
Child Marriage Restraint Act ,1929 Section 9/10

Petitioner(s)

HARIPADA ROY AND ANR SATYAKI BASU

SABITA ROY

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

XXX

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

09-04-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

10-04-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Haripada Roy and another petitioner in connection with Bhorer Alo P.S Case No. 321 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 85/108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court rejected the plea citing grave and serious allegations, the fact that a warrant of arrest had already been issued, and the petitioners' failure to surrender before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Haripada Roy and another petitioner in connection with Bhorer Alo P.S Case No. 321 of 2025 for alleged offences under Sections 85/108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court rejected the plea citing grave and serious allegations, the fact that a warrant of arrest had already been issued, and the petitioners' failure to surrender before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case