VIVEKANANDA DAS@BIBEKANANDA DAS AND ORS MRINMAYEE DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /220/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0013112026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

CRM(A) /220/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

CRM(A) /220/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

VIVEKANANDA DAS@BIBEKANANDA DAS AND ORS MRINMAYEE DAS

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

25-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Summary The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri allowed the anticipatory bail application of Vivekananda Das and others under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding that custodial interrogation was not required based on the case materials and alleged roles. The court granted bail with conditions requiring Rs. 10,000 bond per petitioner with two local sureties, cooperation with investigation, weekly meetings with the investigating officer, and undertaking not to threaten or intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri allowed the anticipatory bail application of Vivekananda Das and others under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, finding that custodial interrogation was not required based on the case materials and alleged roles. The court granted bail with conditions requiring Rs. 10,000 bond per petitioner with two local sureties, cooperation with investigation, weekly meetings with the investigating officer, and undertaking not to threaten or intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case