MITHU HOQUE @ MITHU HAQUE AND ORS. SANDIP GUHA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /219/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0013102026
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A) /219/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
CRM(A) /219/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MITHU HOQUE @ MITHU HAQUE AND ORS. SANDIP GUHA ROY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners (including Mithu Hoque and others) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, reversing the earlier rejection by the Sessions Judge. The court directed their release on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, on conditions including regular court appearance and weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners (including Mithu Hoque and others) in a case involving alleged offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 351(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, reversing the earlier rejection by the Sessions Judge. The court directed their release on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, on conditions including regular court appearance and weekly meetings with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts