NARAYAN SARKAR SHUBHAM KUMAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /213/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0012932026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

CRM(A) /213/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

CRM(A) /213/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

NARAYAN SARKAR SHUBHAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

24-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Summary The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Narayan Sarkar in a case involving alleged transmission of obscene photographs under BNS sections 115(2), 351(2), 75(2), and 3(5). The court found merit in the petitioner's claim of false implication and his willingness to cooperate with investigation, including surrendering his mobile phone. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions requiring weekly meetings with investigators and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Narayan Sarkar in a case involving alleged transmission of obscene photographs under BNS sections 115(2), 351(2), 75(2), and 3(5). The court found merit in the petitioner's claim of false implication and his willingness to cooperate with investigation, including surrendering his mobile phone. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions requiring weekly meetings with investigators and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case