MANKA MAHATO JAYDEEP KANTA BHOWMIK vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRA(DB) /22/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2). Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0012372026
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
CRA(DB) /22/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
CRA(DB) /22/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANKA MAHATO JAYDEEP KANTA BHOWMIK
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
FOR ADMISSION
ADMISSION OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
ADMISSION OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 27-03-2026 | ADMISSION OF CRIMINAL APPEAL | |
| 23-03-2026 | ADMISSION OF CRIMINAL APPEAL |
Orders
Case Adjourned The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) in the appeal of Manka Mahato adjourned the matter to March 27, 2026. The court directed the department to open and examine a sealed envelope containing the certified copy of the conviction and sentence order, calculate any applicable limitation period, and reseal it. The appellant was also ordered to serve copies of the condonation of delay application and memorandum of appeal upon the de facto complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Adjourned The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) in the appeal of Manka Mahato adjourned the matter to March 27, 2026. The court directed the department to open and examine a sealed envelope containing the certified copy of the conviction and sentence order, calculate any applicable limitation period, and reseal it. The appellant was also ordered to serve copies of the condonation of delay application and memorandum of appeal upon the de facto complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts