M/S. GAMING AND HOTEL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KHUSHI KUNDU vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRLE AND ORS. — WPA/452/2026

Case under Income-tax Act ,1961 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0012182026

Filing Number

WPA/453/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/452/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act ,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GAMING AND HOTEL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KHUSHI KUNDU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRLE AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) issued a corrigendum order dated 07.05.2026 in WPA 452/2026. The court corrected an inadvertent typographical error in its previous order dated 24.3.2026, wherein the financial year mentioned in paragraph 1 (6th line) and paragraph 5 (last line) on page 3 should be read as '2021-2022' instead of '2020-2021.' All other portions of the original order remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) issued a corrigendum order dated 07.05.2026 in WPA 452/2026. The court corrected an inadvertent typographical error in its previous order dated 24.3.2026, wherein the financial year mentioned in paragraph 1 (6th line) and paragraph 5 (last line) on page 3 should be read as '2021-2022' instead of '2020-2021.' All other portions of the original order remain unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case