SAIDUL MIA@SAIDUL ISLAM RATAN CHANDRA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /187/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0012032026
Next Hearing
19th March 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A) /188/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
CRM(A) /187/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAIDUL MIA@SAIDUL ISLAM RATAN CHANDRA ROY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL | |
| 23-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL | |
| 20-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Saidul Mia under Section 482 of the BNSS 2023 in connection with Sitai P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025. The court found the petitioner was falsely implicated, noting the injury report showed no grievous injury and allegations arose only after his second marriage. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with conditions requiring cooperation with investigation, bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Saidul Mia under Section 482 of the BNSS 2023 in connection with Sitai P.S. Case No. 201 of 2025. The court found the petitioner was falsely implicated, noting the injury report showed no grievous injury and allegations arose only after his second marriage. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with conditions requiring cooperation with investigation, bi-weekly meetings with the investigating officer, and no witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts