MINTU MIAH@HAQUE RATAN CHANDRA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /186/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0012012026
Next Hearing
19th March 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A) /186/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
CRM(A) /186/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MINTU MIAH@HAQUE RATAN CHANDRA ROY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL | |
| 23-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL | |
| 20-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to Mintu Miah @ Hoque in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, causing grievous hurt, and attempted murder, relying on the fact that similarly circumstanced co-accused were previously granted bail. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, mandatory surrender within four weeks, movement restriction beyond Dinhata Police Station jurisdiction for four weeks, and a prohibition on intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to Mintu Miah @ Hoque in a case involving charges of wrongful restraint, causing grievous hurt, and attempted murder, relying on the fact that similarly circumstanced co-accused were previously granted bail. The court imposed strict conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, mandatory surrender within four weeks, movement restriction beyond Dinhata Police Station jurisdiction for four weeks, and a prohibition on intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts