ABHIJIT ROY@ABHI SUDIP KR PAUL vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /183/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0011892026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

CRM(A) /183/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

CRM(A) /183/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

ABHIJIT ROY@ABHI SUDIP KR PAUL

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

18-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

23-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Abhijit Roy in a cyber case involving allegations under BNS Sections 196(1a)(1b)/353(2)/299, finding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioner's undertaking not to post content disturbing communal harmony. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to weekly cooperation with investigators and conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and communal disharmony posts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Abhijit Roy in a cyber case involving allegations under BNS Sections 196(1a)(1b)/353(2)/299, finding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the petitioner's undertaking not to post content disturbing communal harmony. The petitioner was released on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to weekly cooperation with investigators and conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and communal disharmony posts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case