ABHINANDAN BARMAN AND ORS. TANNU AGARWAL vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /180/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0011782026
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A) /180/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
CRM(A) /180/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABHINANDAN BARMAN AND ORS. TANNU AGARWAL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application of Abhinandan Barman and others in a case involving alleged assault causing fracture injuries. The court found sufficient incriminating evidence in the case diary and rejected the petitioners' claim of false implication, holding this was not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application of Abhinandan Barman and others in a case involving alleged assault causing fracture injuries. The court found sufficient incriminating evidence in the case diary and rejected the petitioners' claim of false implication, holding this was not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts