STATE BANK OF INDIA TRISHA MUKHERJEE vs THE COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SLG COMMISSIONERSTE AND ORS. — WPA/433/2026

Case under Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0011632026

Filing Number

WPA/434/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPA/433/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA TRISHA MUKHERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, SLG COMMISSIONERSTE AND ORS.

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    Summary: In WPA 433 of 2026, State Bank of India v. The Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) adjourned the case due to technical difficulties. The court noted that the petitioner's Senior Counsel experienced internet connection issues preventing audible submissions, and therefore listed the matter before the next available Circuit Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPA 433 of 2026, State Bank of India v. The Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) adjourned the case due to technical difficulties. The court noted that the petitioner's Senior Counsel experienced internet connection issues preventing audible submissions, and therefore listed the matter before the next available Circuit Bench for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case