ALAMIN HAQUE vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/175/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0011352026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/175/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/175/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALAMIN HAQUE
Adv. Hillol Saha Podder
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta rejected Alamin Haque's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case. The court found that while the petitioner argued there was only co-accused statements against him, the State produced incriminating materials from the case diary and highlighted two other pending NDPS cases against the petitioner (from 2018 and 2026), making it an unfit case for anticipatory bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/175/2026
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta rejected Alamin Haque's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS Act case. The court found that while the petitioner argued there was only co-accused statements against him, the State produced incriminating materials from the case diary and highlighted two other pending NDPS cases against the petitioner (from 2018 and 2026), making it an unfit case for anticipatory bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts