BINOY ROY PRITI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /150/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0008972026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th February 2026

Filing Number

CRM(A) /150/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

CRM(A) /150/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ,1985 Section 20BIIC,29

Petitioner(s)

BINOY ROY PRITI DAS

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

27-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

24-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

23-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

18-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

27-02-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
17-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
24-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The Calcutta High Court rejected Binoy Roy's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 489/2025). The court found sufficient incriminating material against the petitioner, including witness statements identifying him as the pillion rider who fled the scene, his ownership of the motorcycle used in the offense, and other case evidence, making it unfit for anticipatory bail under Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court rejected Binoy Roy's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 489/2025). The court found sufficient incriminating material against the petitioner, including witness statements identifying him as the pillion rider who fled the scene, his ownership of the motorcycle used in the offense, and other case evidence, making it unfit for anticipatory bail under Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

the-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023 narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case