BINOY ROY PRITI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/150/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0008972026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/150/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/150/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BINOY ROY PRITI DAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court rejected Binoy Roy's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 489/2025). The court found sufficient incriminating material against the petitioner, including witness statements identifying him as the pillion rider who fled the scene, his ownership of the motorcycle used in the offense, and other case evidence, making it unfit for anticipatory bail under Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
18-Mar-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/150/2026
The Calcutta High Court rejected Binoy Roy's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS drug trafficking case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 489/2025). The court found sufficient incriminating material against the petitioner, including witness statements identifying him as the pillion rider who fled the scene, his ownership of the motorcycle used in the offense, and other case evidence, making it unfit for anticipatory bail under Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts