AJAY ROY @ RAJA SHUBHAM KUMAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/83/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0008532026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th February 2026

Filing Number

CRR /83/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

CRR /83/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

AJAY ROY @ RAJA SHUBHAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

25-02-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

23-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

20-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

19-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

27-02-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The Calcutta High Court stayed the arrest warrant against Ajay Roy for four weeks, recognizing special circumstances where the petitioner and the alleged victim married during the trial proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within four weeks, after which his bail application would be considered in accordance with law, noting the parties' misconception that marriage would automatically discontinue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court stayed the arrest warrant against Ajay Roy for four weeks, recognizing special circumstances where the petitioner and the alleged victim married during the trial proceedings. The court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within four weeks, after which his bail application would be considered in accordance with law, noting the parties' misconception that marriage would automatically discontinue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case