NIRMAL CHANDRA DEY MRINMAYEE DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/279/2026

Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Feb-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0008162026

Filing Number

WPA/279/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPA/279/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

BUILDING PLAN ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMAL CHANDRA DEY MRINMAYEE DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    The petitioner sought correction of an order dated 19.3.2026, claiming a measurement size was incorrectly stated as '4ft' instead of '3ft'. The court rejected the correction petition, noting that the original writ petition itself mentioned '4ft' and found no apparent error on the face of the record. The order remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The petitioner sought correction of an order dated 19.3.2026, claiming a measurement size was incorrectly stated as '4ft' instead of '3ft'. The court rejected the correction petition, noting that the original writ petition itself mentioned '4ft' and found no apparent error on the face of the record. The order remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case