INDRAJIT SARKAR AND ANR MOUSUMI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/143/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0007712026

Filing Number

CRM(A)/143/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRM(A)/143/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ,1985 Section 20BIIC/25,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDRAJIT SARKAR AND ANR MOUSUMI DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) adjourned the anticipatory bail application without granting or denying relief. The court directed the investigating officer to file a report within one day detailing any phone communications between the petitioners and principal accused, money trails, and criminal antecedents of the petitioners. The matter is listed for hearing before the next Circuit Bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(A)/143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) adjourned the anticipatory bail application without granting or denying relief. The court directed the investigating officer to file a report within one day detailing any phone communications between the petitioners and principal accused, money trails, and criminal antecedents of the petitioners. The matter is listed for hearing before the next Circuit Bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case