SURAKASH CHHETRI NISHANT NAV RASAILY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/134/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0007502026
Next Hearing
19th February 2026
Filing Number
CRM(NDPS) /134/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
CRM(NDPS) /134/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAKASH CHHETRI NISHANT NAV RASAILY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 25-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 19-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 18-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 17-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
Summary The Calcutta High Court granted bail to Suraksha Chhetri in an NDPS case, citing excessive custody of over 1,270 days and the trial's slow progress with only 9 of 14 prosecution witnesses examined due to repeated adjournments and witness non-appearances. The court invoked Article 21 of the Constitution and released the petitioner on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions that she appear at all hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Calcutta High Court granted bail to Suraksha Chhetri in an NDPS case, citing excessive custody of over 1,270 days and the trial's slow progress with only 9 of 14 prosecution witnesses examined due to repeated adjournments and witness non-appearances. The court invoked Article 21 of the Constitution and released the petitioner on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions that she appear at all hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts