TAPAS SARKAR @ TAPASH SARKAR AND ANR ARNAB SAHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/66/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0006312026
Filing Number
CRR/66/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRR/66/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAPAS SARKAR @ TAPASH SARKAR AND ANR ARNAB SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri quashed criminal proceedings against Tapas Sarkar (husband) and his mother-in-law under BNS Sections 109/115(2)/55/85, finding that the private parties had reached a settlement and compromise. The court noted the couple was living together with their minor child and the wife did not want the accused to remain imprisoned, determining quashing was in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Criminal Motion
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
19-Feb-2026
Criminal Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
18-Feb-2026
Criminal Motion
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
17-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/66/2026
The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri quashed criminal proceedings against Tapas Sarkar (husband) and his mother-in-law under BNS Sections 109/115(2)/55/85, finding that the private parties had reached a settlement and compromise. The court noted the couple was living together with their minor child and the wife did not want the accused to remain imprisoned, determining quashing was in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts