TAPAS SARKAR @ TAPASH SARKAR AND ANR ARNAB SAHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR /66/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0006312026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

17th February 2026

Filing Number

CRR /66/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

CRR /66/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 438,528
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 307,323,115,498A
Dowry Prohibition Act ,1961 Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

TAPAS SARKAR @ TAPASH SARKAR AND ANR ARNAB SAHA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

17-02-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

24-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

19-02-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

18-02-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri quashed criminal proceedings against Tapas Sarkar (husband) and his mother-in-law under BNS Sections 109/115(2)/55/85, finding that the private parties had reached a settlement and compromise. The court noted the couple was living together with their minor child and the wife did not want the accused to remain imprisoned, determining quashing was in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri quashed criminal proceedings against Tapas Sarkar (husband) and his mother-in-law under BNS Sections 109/115(2)/55/85, finding that the private parties had reached a settlement and compromise. The court noted the couple was living together with their minor child and the wife did not want the accused to remain imprisoned, determining quashing was in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case