SWARAJDEEP SAHA AND ORS SRIJA BHOWMIK vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/62/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0005952026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th February 2026

Filing Number

CRR/62/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

CRR/62/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 528
Dowry Prohibition Act ,1961 Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

SWARAJDEEP SAHA AND ORS SRIJA BHOWMIK

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

19-02-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri quashed FIR No. 30 of 2026 against the husband, mother-in-law, and father-in-law of the complainant for dowry-related offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and BNS, 2023. The court granted the quashing based on an amicable settlement reached between both parties, as evidenced by affidavits filed in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri quashed FIR No. 30 of 2026 against the husband, mother-in-law, and father-in-law of the complainant for dowry-related offences under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and BNS, 2023. The court granted the quashing based on an amicable settlement reached between both parties, as evidenced by affidavits filed in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case