RABIN BISWAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M) /30/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0005122026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th February 2026

Filing Number

CRM(M) /30/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

CRM(M) /30/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act Section 6,

Petitioner(s)

RABIN BISWAS

Adv. Hillol Saha Podder

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

18-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

25-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL-POCSO

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed the bail application (C.R.M. (M) 30 of 2026) filed by Rabin Biswas as "not pressed" on March 25, 2026. The application sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a POCSO Act case (Malbazar Police Station Case No. 844 of 2023), but was withdrawn by the petitioner's advocate during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri dismissed the bail application (C.R.M. (M) 30 of 2026) filed by Rabin Biswas as "not pressed" on March 25, 2026. The application sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with a POCSO Act case (Malbazar Police Station Case No. 844 of 2023), but was withdrawn by the petitioner's advocate during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case