BAPI ALIAS BAPPI MIA ALIAS MIYA CHANDAN ROY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/23/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0003912026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/23/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/23/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAPI ALIAS BAPPI MIA ALIAS MIYA CHANDAN ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF
The Calcutta High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a POCSO Act case on grounds of parity with his co-accused, who had been similarly granted bail by a coordinate bench. The court considered that both stood on equal footing and that the victim had refused medical examination, warranting extension of the same bail facility to the petitioner. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions that he appear at all trial hearings and not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Suvra GhoshView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
17-Feb-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Suvra Ghosh
-
11-Feb-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/23/2026
The Calcutta High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a POCSO Act case on grounds of parity with his co-accused, who had been similarly granted bail by a coordinate bench. The court considered that both stood on equal footing and that the victim had refused medical examination, warranting extension of the same bail facility to the petitioner. The petitioner was released on a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions that he appear at all trial hearings and not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts