THE PRINCIPAL MANBHUM MAHAVIDYALAYA ANKITA DEY vs SARADA MONDAL DAS AND OTHERS — MAT /821/2020

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA1108832020

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th January 2021

Filing Number

MAT /18864/2020

Filing Date

18-12-2020

Registration No

MAT /821/2020

Registration Date

18-12-2020

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Residuary ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

NO ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

THE PRINCIPAL MANBHUM MAHAVIDYALAYA ANKITA DEY

Respondent(s)

SARADA MONDAL DAS AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

07-01-2021

FOR ADMISSION

13-04-2026

APPLICATION ( GR. - II )

16-02-2026

APPEAL

13-02-2026

APPEAL

12-02-2026

APPEAL

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY,HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE

The court adjourned all consolidated matters (FMA 498 of 2021, MAT 1112 of 2025, MAT 1598-1599 of 2018, and MAT 821 of 2020) involving employment disputes against the State of West Bengal and educational institutions on the joint prayer of all parties. The cases have been relisted for May 2026, indicating the parties sought time for settlement negotiations or further deliberations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court adjourned all consolidated matters (FMA 498 of 2021, MAT 1112 of 2025, MAT 1598-1599 of 2018, and MAT 821 of 2020) involving employment disputes against the State of West Bengal and educational institutions on the joint prayer of all parties. The cases have been relisted for May 2026, indicating the parties sought time for settlement negotiations or further deliberations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case