KALYANI MONDAL AND ORS SOUNAK MANDAL vs PINTU RANI MONDAL AND ORS — CO/4485/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Jan-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0623532024

Filing Number

CO/4529/2024

Filing Date

24-Dec-2024

Registration No

CO/4485/2024

Registration Date

24-Dec-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALYANI MONDAL AND ORS SOUNAK MANDAL

  2. 2.SAURAV MONDAL

  3. 3.SUSMITA ROY ALIAS SUSMITA MONDAL NEE ROY

  4. 4.ANUP KUMAR MONDAL ALIAS ANUP CHANDRA MONDAL

  5. 5.UTTM MONDAL ALIAS UTTAM CHANDRA MONDAL

  6. 6.SOROJU MONDAL NEE HALDER

  7. 7.SHEFALI MONDAL NEE DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PINTU RANI MONDAL AND ORS

  2. 2.DIPALI MONDAL MALI ALIAS MALIK

  3. 3.CHAITALI POLLEY

  4. 4.MITALI SANTRA

  5. 5.RUPALI GHORAI

  6. 6.MIRA HALDER

  7. 7.SURAJIT MONDAL

  8. 8.PRATAP CHANDRA MONDAL

  9. 9.PRATUL CHANDRA MONDAL

  10. 10.GOLOK CHANDRA MONDAL

  11. 11.DILIP CHANDRA MONDAL

  12. 12.ARABINDRA MONDAL

  13. 13.BARUN MONDAL

  14. 14.MIHIR CHANDRA MONDAL

  15. 15.NEMAI MONDAL

  16. 16.TAPAS MONDAL

  17. 17.SUBRATA MONDAL

  18. 18.BIDHAN CHANDRA MONDAL

  19. 19.BIMAL CHANDRA MONDAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

    Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Civil Revisional petition, upholding the trial court's decision that a partition suit by legal heirs is maintainable and not barred by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court held that the Act has no retrospective effect since the property deeds were executed in 1949 and 1958, before the 1988 Act came into force, and that the suit seeks inheritance and co-ownership rights based on legitimate succession rather than benami claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  11. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar GuptaView PDF

  12. 19-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  17. 12-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  18. 11-Mar-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  20. 01-Dec-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  21. 03-Nov-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  22. 01-Sep-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  23. 04-Aug-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  24. 07-Jul-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  25. 09-Jun-2025

    Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit Basu

  26. 21-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Biswajit BasuView PDF

  27. 26-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF

  28. 26-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  29. 25-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  30. 24-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  31. 21-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  32. 20-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  33. 19-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  34. 18-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

  35. 10-Feb-2025

    New Motion - 3

    Hon'ble Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury

  36. 06-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 24-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/4485/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed the Civil Revisional petition, upholding the trial court's decision that a partition suit by legal heirs is maintainable and not barred by the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. The court held that the Act has no retrospective effect since the property deeds were executed in 1949 and 1958, before the 1988 Act came into force, and that the suit seeks inheritance and co-ownership rights based on legitimate succession rather than benami claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case