ANYATRIKA ROY DEVRANJAN DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /194/2026

Case under West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0608762025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th January 2026

Filing Number

WPA /30079/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

WPA /194/2026

Registration Date

03-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Selection Process 100 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ANYATRIKA ROY DEVRANJAN DAS

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, GOVT OF WB

THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVT OF WB

THE SECRETARY, WBBSE

THE CHAIRMAN, WBCSSC

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

13-01-2026

NEW MOTION

23-03-2026

MOTION

20-03-2026

MOTION

19-03-2026

MOTION

18-03-2026

MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA

Case Summary The West Bengal High Court dismissed Anyatrika Roy's writ petition challenging her inability to change her exam category from General to OBC-B in the SLST examination. The court held that sufficient time (July-August 2025) was provided to edit applications, and permitting retroactive modifications would create administrative chaos and set a problematic precedent for unsuccessful candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The West Bengal High Court dismissed Anyatrika Roy's writ petition challenging her inability to change her exam category from General to OBC-B in the SLST examination. The court held that sufficient time (July-August 2025) was provided to edit applications, and permitting retroactive modifications would create administrative chaos and set a problematic precedent for unsuccessful candidates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case