JIAUL MOMIN SHAMIM UL BARI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/115/2026

Case under West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Jan-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0608512025

Filing Number

WPA/30070/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPA/115/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

In service Other 117 ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JIAUL MOMIN SHAMIM UL BARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, WB

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL (SE), MALDA

  4. 4.WEST BENGAL CENTRAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION, SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY

  5. 5.THE CHAIRMAN, WBCSSC

  6. 6.THE SECRETARY, WBCSSC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar MitraView PDF

    The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jiaul Momin challenging the marks allotted by WBCSSC in an OMR-based examination. The court found that the petitioner's answer sheet had multiple shadings in question 15 (both options A and B marked), which prevented the computer from reading it correctly, and rejected the plea for manual evaluation since all candidates' sheets were evaluated uniformly by computer. The court upheld the Commission's decision and found no error in the evaluation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

  11. 01-Mar-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  13. 30-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  14. 29-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  15. 28-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  16. 27-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  17. 22-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  19. 20-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  20. 19-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  21. 16-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  22. 15-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  23. 14-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  24. 13-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  25. 09-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  26. 08-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jiaul Momin challenging the marks allotted by WBCSSC in an OMR-based examination. The court found that the petitioner's answer sheet had multiple shadings in question 15 (both options A and B marked), which prevented the computer from reading it correctly, and rejected the plea for manual evaluation since all candidates' sheets were evaluated uniformly by computer. The court upheld the Commission's decision and found no error in the evaluation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case