JIAUL MOMIN SHAMIM UL BARI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /115/2026
Case under West Bengal School Service Commission Act ,1997 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0608512025
Next Hearing
08th January 2026
Filing Number
WPA /30070/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
WPA /115/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In service Other 117 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JIAUL MOMIN SHAMIM UL BARI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, WB
THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL (SE), MALDA
WEST BENGAL CENTRAL SCHOOL SERVICE COMMISSION, SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY
THE CHAIRMAN, WBCSSC
THE SECRETARY, WBCSSC
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-01-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 20-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 19-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 18-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jiaul Momin challenging the marks allotted by WBCSSC in an OMR-based examination. The court found that the petitioner's answer sheet had multiple shadings in question 15 (both options A and B marked), which prevented the computer from reading it correctly, and rejected the plea for manual evaluation since all candidates' sheets were evaluated uniformly by computer. The court upheld the Commission's decision and found no error in the evaluation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jiaul Momin challenging the marks allotted by WBCSSC in an OMR-based examination. The court found that the petitioner's answer sheet had multiple shadings in question 15 (both options A and B marked), which prevented the computer from reading it correctly, and rejected the plea for manual evaluation since all candidates' sheets were evaluated uniformly by computer. The court upheld the Commission's decision and found no error in the evaluation process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts