ABDUL MOHAIMIN @ MAHASEN TANUSREE KAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(M) /103/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0606342025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

15th January 2026

Filing Number

CRM(M) /2988/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

CRM(M) /103/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 302/307/325/447/34

Petitioner(s)

ABDUL MOHAIMIN @ MAHASEN TANUSREE KAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

15-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

23-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

03-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

30-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

29-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed the bail application of Abdul Mohaimin @ Mahasen, accused of murder and related offenses. The court granted bail considering the petitioner's 1 year 11 months in custody with minimal trial progress (only 3 of 28 witnesses examined), finding no reasonable likelihood of trial completion within a reasonable timeframe. The petitioner was released on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, two sureties, and restrictions on entering Ratua Police Station jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Calcutta High Court allowed the bail application of Abdul Mohaimin @ Mahasen, accused of murder and related offenses. The court granted bail considering the petitioner's 1 year 11 months in custody with minimal trial progress (only 3 of 28 witnesses examined), finding no reasonable likelihood of trial completion within a reasonable timeframe. The petitioner was released on bail with stringent conditions including a Rs. 20,000 bond, two sureties, and restrictions on entering Ratua Police Station jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case