RAJU KABRA AND ANR. TAPAN KR. MAHAPATRA vs CHOWDHURY MD. SOUKAT AND ANR. — FAT/570/2025
Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCA0602782025
Filing Number
FAT/549/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
FAT/570/2025
Registration Date
24-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJU KABRA AND ANR. TAPAN KR. MAHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHOWDHURY MD. SOUKAT AND ANR.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
Summary: The appeal against the final partition decree was admitted as being within limitation despite initial procedural defects. However, the court found no prima facie case since the appellants failed to challenge the preliminary decree that established the plaintiffs' title and shares. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the appellants to file a separate appeal against the preliminary decree along with a condonation of delay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Application (Civil)
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Application (Civil)
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
17-Mar-2026
Application (Civil)
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FAT/570/2025
Summary: The appeal against the final partition decree was admitted as being within limitation despite initial procedural defects. However, the court found no prima facie case since the appellants failed to challenge the preliminary decree that established the plaintiffs' title and shares. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the appellants to file a separate appeal against the preliminary decree along with a condonation of delay application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts