The Director General Central Reserve Police Force CRPF Recruitment Board and others SAMRAT GHOSH vs Raju Sarkar and others — MAT/2223/2025

Case under Indian Police Act ,1861 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Dec-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0587492025

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

MAT/2277/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

MAT/2223/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Police Act ,1861 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Director General Central Reserve Police Force CRPF Recruitment Board and others SAMRAT GHOSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Sarkar and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

  3. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

  4. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

    The court disposed of the CRPF's appeal as infructuous after the Supreme Court settled identical height measurement issues in a related case. Following the Apex Court's ruling that candidates measuring 169.5 cm or above cannot be disqualified for insufficient height (with 0.5 cm decimal ignored and rounded up), CRPF's advocate conceded that none of the respondent candidates fell below this threshold, eliminating the case's merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  6. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAT/2223/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the CRPF's appeal as infructuous after the Supreme Court settled identical height measurement issues in a related case. Following the Apex Court's ruling that candidates measuring 169.5 cm or above cannot be disqualified for insufficient height (with 0.5 cm decimal ignored and rounded up), CRPF's advocate conceded that none of the respondent candidates fell below this threshold, eliminating the case's merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case