The Director General Central Reserve Police Force Recruitment Branch and another SAMRAT GHOSH vs Tania Khatun and others — MAT/2218/2025
Case under Indian Police Act ,1861 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0587402025
Next Hearing
23rd December 2025
e-Filing Number
16-12-2025
Filing Number
MAT/2274/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
MAT/2218/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Director General Central Reserve Police Force Recruitment Branch and another SAMRAT GHOSH
Respondent(s)
Tania Khatun and others
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: MAT/2218/2025 The court disposed of the CRPF's appeal as infructuous after the petitioner (Tania Khatun) was found to meet the minimum height requirement for constable recruitment. Applying Supreme Court precedent establishing that heights of 169.5cm and above should be rounded up to the next centimeter, the court found the petitioner measured at least 156.5cm against the 157cm requirement, satisfying the qualification criteria and rendering the appeal moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MAT/2218/2025 The court disposed of the CRPF's appeal as infructuous after the petitioner (Tania Khatun) was found to meet the minimum height requirement for constable recruitment. Applying Supreme Court precedent establishing that heights of 169.5cm and above should be rounded up to the next centimeter, the court found the petitioner measured at least 156.5cm against the 157cm requirement, satisfying the qualification criteria and rendering the appeal moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts