KARTICK CHANDRA SAHA SANKHA BISWAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/29162/2025
Case under Essential Commodities Act ,1995 Section NA. Disposed: --DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0587182025
Next Hearing
24th December 2025
Filing Number
WPA/29019/2025
Filing Date
16-12-2025
Registration No
WPA/29162/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARTICK CHANDRA SAHA SANKHA BISWAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
NEW MOTION ( GR - VIII)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-12-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 19-01-2026 | NEW MOTION ( GR - VIII) |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta struck down the 45-year age limit imposed on Fair Price Shop Dealer applicants, finding it violated fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution. Justice Smita Das De held that the age restriction was manifestly arbitrary, lacked rational nexus with the objective sought to be achieved, and discriminatorily debarred citizens above 45 from competing for licenses while allowing older persons to continue or obtain licenses through compassionate appointments. The court directed the state to permit all eligible petitioners to participate in the selection process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta struck down the 45-year age limit imposed on Fair Price Shop Dealer applicants, finding it violated fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution. Justice Smita Das De held that the age restriction was manifestly arbitrary, lacked rational nexus with the objective sought to be achieved, and discriminatorily debarred citizens above 45 from competing for licenses while allowing older persons to continue or obtain licenses through compassionate appointments. The court directed the state to permit all eligible petitioners to participate in the selection process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts