DEBASISH GOSWAMI AND ANR SUDIPTA MAITI vs RANDHIR KUMAR DIRECTOR OF PPF AND GROUP INS AND ORS — CPAN/2023/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Dec-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0582782025

Filing Number

CPAN/2066/2025

Filing Date

15-Dec-2025

Registration No

CPAN/2023/2025

Registration Date

16-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEBASISH GOSWAMI AND ANR SUDIPTA MAITI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANDHIR KUMAR DIRECTOR OF PPF AND GROUP INS AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application filed by Debasish Goswami and Sudipta Maiti against the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, finding that the contempt application was not maintainable since no specific deadline was set in the previous November 26, 2024 order for the State authorities to complete the succession certificate process. The court noted that applicants were merely granted liberty to obtain the succession certificate and submit it for release of benefits, and the application's dismissal does not preclude them from pursuing lawful remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Contempt

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/2023/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application filed by Debasish Goswami and Sudipta Maiti against the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, finding that the contempt application was not maintainable since no specific deadline was set in the previous November 26, 2024 order for the State authorities to complete the succession certificate process. The court noted that applicants were merely granted liberty to obtain the succession certificate and submit it for release of benefits, and the application's dismissal does not preclude them from pursuing lawful remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case