SAIFUL BISWAS AND ORS vs PAPIYA BISWAS PANCHAYAT PRADHAN HAT KHOLA GRAM PANCHAYAT — CPAN/1897/2024

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section NA. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0580632024

Filing Number

CPAN/1920/2024

Filing Date

04-Dec-2024

Registration No

CPAN/1897/2024

Registration Date

04-Dec-2024

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAIFUL BISWAS AND ORS

    Adv. Madhurima Sarkar

  2. 2.OHAB BISWAS

  3. 3.JULFIKAR BISWAS

  4. 4.RAHIMA MONDAL

  5. 5.KOHINUR MANDAL

  6. 6.CHHABEHAR BISWAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAPIYA BISWAS PANCHAYAT PRADHAN HAT KHOLA GRAM PANCHAYAT

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

    Case Summary: CPAN 1897/2024 The High Court at Calcutta issued a Rule of Contempt against respondent Papiya Biswas (the contemnor) on May 7, 2026, returnable on July 2, 2026. The contemnor failed to appear despite proper service. The Court ordered that the pendency of the contempt application shall not prevent the contemnor from complying with previous Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2025

    Application 1

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha

  5. 06-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF

  6. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CPAN/1897/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CPAN 1897/2024 The High Court at Calcutta issued a Rule of Contempt against respondent Papiya Biswas (the contemnor) on May 7, 2026, returnable on July 2, 2026. The contemnor failed to appear despite proper service. The Court ordered that the pendency of the contempt application shall not prevent the contemnor from complying with previous Court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case