MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY vs PURNA CHANDRA MAITY — FAT/552/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N.A. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0579362025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

FAT/535/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

FAT/552/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Partition ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N.A

Petitioner(s)

MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY

Respondent(s)

PURNA CHANDRA MAITY

Hearing History

16-12-2025

FOR ADMISSION

07-05-2026

APPLICATION (CIVIL)

06-05-2026

APPLICATION (CIVIL)

05-05-2026

APPLICATION (CIVIL)

04-05-2026

APPLICATION (CIVIL)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case