MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY vs PURNA CHANDRA MAITY — FAT/552/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N.A. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCA0579362025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
FAT/535/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
FAT/552/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Partition ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY
Respondent(s)
PURNA CHANDRA MAITY
Hearing History
FOR ADMISSION
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 07-05-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
| 06-05-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
| 05-05-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
| 04-05-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
Orders
Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts