MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY vs PURNA CHANDRA MAITY — FAT/552/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N.A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCA0579362025

Filing Number

FAT/535/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

FAT/552/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Partition ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section N.A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHAB RANJAN MANNA ARITRA SHANKAR RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PURNA CHANDRA MAITY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

    Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  5. 06-May-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  6. 05-May-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  7. 04-May-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  8. 04-May-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  9. 30-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  10. 11-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  12. 08-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  13. 07-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  14. 06-Apr-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  15. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  16. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  17. 05-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  18. 05-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  19. 16-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAT/552/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAT 552/2025 In this property partition appeal, the court recalled an ex parte order dated March 5, 2025 that was passed despite a caveat filed by respondent Purna Chandra Maity. The appellant Madhab Ranjan Manna challenged the trial judge's allocation of the lion's share of front property facing the main road to the respondent and alleged procedural irregularities. The court granted stay of the impugned decree and directed status quo maintenance of physical possession. The matter was referred to the Calcutta High Court Mediation Committee for settlement; if mediation fails, parties may seek appeal enlistment with paper books due within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case