DURGA BANERJEE SANJIB KUMAR GHOSH vs NEMAI GHOSH CHAIRMAN MADHYAMGRAM MUNICIPALITY AND ORS — CPAN/1883/2024
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section N A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0577822024
Filing Number
CPAN/1902/2024
Filing Date
03-Dec-2024
Registration No
CPAN/1883/2024
Registration Date
03-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Civil Contempt ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
FIRST MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (FMA) SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DURGA BANERJEE SANJIB KUMAR GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.NEMAI GHOSH CHAIRMAN MADHYAMGRAM MUNICIPALITY AND ORS
-
2.NEMAI GHOSH
-
3.PRAKASH RAHA
-
4.SUBAHS CHANDRA BANERJEE
-
5.ARABINDA MITRA
-
6.PRAHLAD KUMAR DUTTA
-
7.MD. NAJRUL ISLAM
-
8.RAJENDRA NATH MAHATA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OFFICER, MADHYAMGRAM MUNICIPALITY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application (CPAN 1883/2024) filed by Durga Banerjee against Nemai Ghosh and others for default, as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and sought no adjournment. The court directed parties to act on the basis of the server copy of the order downloaded from the court's official website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2025
Application 1
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
10-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2025
Application 1
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
03-Apr-2025
Application 1
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
15-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CPAN/1883/2024
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the contempt application (CPAN 1883/2024) filed by Durga Banerjee against Nemai Ghosh and others for default, as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and sought no adjournment. The court directed parties to act on the basis of the server copy of the order downloaded from the court's official website. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts