UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BANANI BHATTACHARYA vs SANJIT SHILL AND ANR — WP.CT/262/2025
Case under Administrative Tribunals Act Section 1985. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCA0576712025
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
10-12-2025
Filing Number
WP.CT/261/2025
Filing Date
10-12-2025
Registration No
WP.CT/262/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Coram
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BANANI BHATTACHARYA
THE GENERAL MANAGER(P)
THE CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER
THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER(P)
THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER(P)
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF MECHANICAL ENGINEER
THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEER(DIESEL)
Respondent(s)
SANJIT SHILL AND ANR
DOLA KIRAN KUMAR,SENIOR ENGINEER,DIESEL/ELECTRICAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL , HON'BLE JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
NEW MOTION
TRIBUNAL MOTION
TRIBUNAL MOTION
TRIBUNAL MOTION
TRIBUNAL MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-12-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 08-05-2026 | TRIBUNAL MOTION |
| 08-06-2026 | TRIBUNAL MOTION |
| 04-05-2026 | TRIBUNAL MOTION |
| 05-01-2026 | TRIBUNAL MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary (WPCT 262/2025): The writ petition filed by Union of India and others against Sanjit Shill and another was adjourned on 08.05.2026. The court granted the respondents' prayer for time and deferred the matter for hearing after the ensuing Summer Vacation. Additionally, the respondents were directed not to press the contempt application during the pendency of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (WPCT 262/2025): The writ petition filed by Union of India and others against Sanjit Shill and another was adjourned on 08.05.2026. The court granted the respondents' prayer for time and deferred the matter for hearing after the ensuing Summer Vacation. Additionally, the respondents were directed not to press the contempt application during the pendency of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts