BUL BUL AHMMED SARKAR SYED SHAMSUL AREFIN vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA /27957/2025
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0566452025
Next Hearing
09th December 2025
Filing Number
WPA /28066/2025
Filing Date
05-12-2025
Registration No
WPA /27957/2025
Registration Date
05-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
In service Other 117 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BUL BUL AHMMED SARKAR SYED SHAMSUL AREFIN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-12-2025 | NEW MOTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 20-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 19-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 18-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition of Bul Bul Ahmmed Sarkar, holding that as an unsuccessful candidate in the first State Level Selection Test (2016), he does not fall within the Supreme Court's exception that applies only to selected and appointed candidates. Although the petitioner, being physically handicapped, received a 5% relaxation reducing the postgraduate marks cutoff from 50% to 45%, he failed to meet this benchmark with 42.87% in his Masters degree and is therefore not entitled to further relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition of Bul Bul Ahmmed Sarkar, holding that as an unsuccessful candidate in the first State Level Selection Test (2016), he does not fall within the Supreme Court's exception that applies only to selected and appointed candidates. Although the petitioner, being physically handicapped, received a 5% relaxation reducing the postgraduate marks cutoff from 50% to 45%, he failed to meet this benchmark with 42.87% in his Masters degree and is therefore not entitled to further relaxation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts