NEHA UJJAVAL SARAF @ NEHA SARAF SAYAN BANERJEE vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/5226/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th December 2025.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Dec-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0560232025

Filing Number

CRR/5211/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

CRR/5226/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Residuary matters ( 93 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

10-Dec-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEHA UJJAVAL SARAF @ NEHA SARAF SAYAN BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.UJJAVAL VINED SARAF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF

    The court rejected the petitioner's application to recall an order dated 10th December 2025 that had dismissed the original petition as withdrawn at the petitioner's counsel's instance. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma held that since the dismissal was on the petitioner's own withdrawal, the recall application could not be entertained and was accordingly rejected and dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Application

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/5226/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the petitioner's application to recall an order dated 10th December 2025 that had dismissed the original petition as withdrawn at the petitioner's counsel's instance. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma held that since the dismissal was on the petitioner's own withdrawal, the recall application could not be entertained and was accordingly rejected and dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case