SK. REZAUL KARIM MANAS KUMAR DAS vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WP.ST/255/2025

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Dec-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0557512025

Filing Number

WP.ST/246/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

WP.ST/255/2025

Registration Date

08-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SK. REZAUL KARIM MANAS KUMAR DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of compassionate appointment to the petitioner, the son of a deceased government employee. The petitioner failed on two grounds: (1) he was not wholly dependent on his father as required by the scheme, since his mother was a retired government employee receiving pension; and (2) family income exceeded 90% of the father's salary at death. The court affirmed that compassionate appointment must be granted strictly per policy terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  4. 04-May-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  10. 31-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  12. 24-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  17. 10-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  18. 09-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  19. 02-Mar-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  20. 24-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  21. 23-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  22. 18-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  23. 17-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  24. 16-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  25. 11-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  26. 10-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  27. 09-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  28. 03-Feb-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  29. 28-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  30. 27-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  31. 22-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  32. 21-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  33. 20-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  34. 19-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  35. 16-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  36. 15-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Motions

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  37. 13-Jan-2026

    Motion 1

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad , Hon'ble Justice Prasenjit Biswas

  38. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Madhuresh Prasad,hon'ble Justice Prasenjit BiswasView PDF

  39. 15-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP.ST/255/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of compassionate appointment to the petitioner, the son of a deceased government employee. The petitioner failed on two grounds: (1) he was not wholly dependent on his father as required by the scheme, since his mother was a retired government employee receiving pension; and (2) family income exceeded 90% of the father's salary at death. The court affirmed that compassionate appointment must be granted strictly per policy terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case