SANKAR MALLICK ADRIJA CHATTERJEE vs CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS. — WPA /27355/2025
Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0550402025
Next Hearing
10th December 2025
Filing Number
WPA /27292/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
WPA /27355/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
POST RETIRMENT BENEFITS ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANKAR MALLICK ADRIJA CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-12-2025 | NEW MOTION | |
| 01-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 02-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 02-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition by directing the Managing Director of CSTC to reconsider the retired petitioner's claim for full leave encashment of 300 days (instead of the 180 days paid) within eight weeks, in accordance with the Government Order dated September 17, 2009. The court ordered the State to provide necessary financial assistance to CSTC for payment of the balance 120 days' leave encashment if the petitioner is found eligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the writ petition by directing the Managing Director of CSTC to reconsider the retired petitioner's claim for full leave encashment of 300 days (instead of the 180 days paid) within eight weeks, in accordance with the Government Order dated September 17, 2009. The court ordered the State to provide necessary financial assistance to CSTC for payment of the balance 120 days' leave encashment if the petitioner is found eligible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts