SHYAMLAL HEMBRAM ANITA KHATRI vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/27080/2025
Case under Police Act ,1861 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0543402025
Next Hearing
01st December 2025
Filing Number
WPA/26937/2025
Filing Date
24-11-2025
Registration No
WPA/27080/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
POLICE INACTION/ACTION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHYAMLAL HEMBRAM ANITA KHATRI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR , HON'BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
NEW MOTION
GROUP - V
HEARING
HEARING
NEW MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-12-2025 | NEW MOTION |
| 12-05-2026 | GROUP - V |
| 10-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-03-2026 | NEW MOTION |
Orders
The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the land dispute between the petitioner and private respondents regarding alleged encroachment on plot 2597 is essentially civil in nature. The court found that since there is a contested issue of title, possession, and interest in the disputed land portion, such factual matters cannot be determined through extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the petitioner must approach the appropriate civil forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The West Bengal High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the land dispute between the petitioner and private respondents regarding alleged encroachment on plot 2597 is essentially civil in nature. The court found that since there is a contested issue of title, possession, and interest in the disputed land portion, such factual matters cannot be determined through extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the petitioner must approach the appropriate civil forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts