CALCUTTA JUTE MANUFACTURING COMPANY RAVI KUMAR DUBEY vs DASHRATH RAJBHAR AND ORS. — WPA/26948/2025

Case under Payment of Gratuity Act ,1973 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0543292025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

03rd December 2025

Filing Number

WPA/26931/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

WPA/26948/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

BONUS/GRATUITY ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratuity Act ,1973 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CALCUTTA JUTE MANUFACTURING COMPANY RAVI KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

DASHRATH RAJBHAR AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

03-12-2025

NEW MOTION

06-05-2026

HEARING (GROUP-III)

31-03-2026

GR. - III (MOTION)

10-03-2026

GR. - III (MOTION)

21-01-2026

GR. - III (MOTION)

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

WPA 26948/2025 Summary The High Court set aside the Controlling Authority's orders refusing to produce ESI documents, holding that since ESIC provided the requested employment and contribution details via affidavit, the petitioner company could use this report as evidence before the Controlling Authority. The court remanded the gratuity claim to the Controlling Authority for expedited decision within 60 days, considering the ESI affidavit and existing record in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

WPA 26948/2025 Summary The High Court set aside the Controlling Authority's orders refusing to produce ESI documents, holding that since ESIC provided the requested employment and contribution details via affidavit, the petitioner company could use this report as evidence before the Controlling Authority. The court remanded the gratuity claim to the Controlling Authority for expedited decision within 60 days, considering the ESI affidavit and existing record in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case