SUJIT HALDER AND ANR. TAPODIP GUPTA vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M) /2404/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0528042025
Next Hearing
20th November 2025
Filing Number
CRM(M) /2444/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
CRM(M) /2404/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUJIT HALDER AND ANR. TAPODIP GUPTA
BIKARAM BALA @ BIKRAM BALA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
TO BE MENTIONED
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-11-2025 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 25-03-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED | |
| 26-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 19-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 01-12-2025 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
Summary: The court granted bail to petitioners Sujit Halder and Bikaram Bala in a POCSO Act case, citing their prolonged detention of over two years and low likelihood of trial conclusion soon. They must furnish bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, remain within Malda district, and appear at all trial dates, with bail cancellation possible upon violation of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted bail to petitioners Sujit Halder and Bikaram Bala in a POCSO Act case, citing their prolonged detention of over two years and low likelihood of trial conclusion soon. They must furnish bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, remain within Malda district, and appear at all trial dates, with bail cancellation possible upon violation of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts