SUKRITI KUMAR BOWALI TRIPARNA ROY vs PAPIYA BOWALI — CO/3909/2025
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 03rd December 2025.
CNR: WBCHCA0518932025
Filing Number
CO/3951/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
CO/3909/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
03-Dec-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUKRITI KUMAR BOWALI TRIPARNA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.PAPIYA BOWALI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa SarkarView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa SarkarView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the husband's recall application, upholding its previous December 3, 2025 order that modified maintenance to Rs. 30,000 monthly (increased from Rs. 10,000 for wife and Rs. 12,000 for daughter) plus arrears in 12 installments. The court found the husband's conduct (loan default, non-compliance with domestic violence orders, forcing wife/child from home) did not warrant reducing maintenance, and rejected his belated attempt to relitigate salary deductions through recalling rather than proper appeal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Application
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
27-Mar-2026
Application
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
20-Mar-2026
Application
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
13-Mar-2026
Application
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
03-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shampa SarkarView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shampa SarkarView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
17-Nov-2025
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Sarkar
-
14-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CO/3909/2025
Summary The court dismissed the husband's recall application, upholding its previous December 3, 2025 order that modified maintenance to Rs. 30,000 monthly (increased from Rs. 10,000 for wife and Rs. 12,000 for daughter) plus arrears in 12 installments. The court found the husband's conduct (loan default, non-compliance with domestic violence orders, forcing wife/child from home) did not warrant reducing maintenance, and rejected his belated attempt to relitigate salary deductions through recalling rather than proper appeal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts