SK. MUNNA AND ANR. RAJA GHOSH vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/25673/2025

Case under The West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0518182025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th November 2025

Filing Number

WPA/25676/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

WPA/25673/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

The West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SK. MUNNA AND ANR. RAJA GHOSH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

18-11-2025

NEW MOTION

06-04-2026

NEW MOTION 1

02-03-2026

NEW MOTION 1

02-02-2026

NEW MOTION 1

05-01-2026

NEW MOTION 1

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)

The High Court of West Bengal disposed of the writ petition challenging the Tarakeshwar Municipality's refusal to provide a water connection and holding number, directing the municipality to consider the petitioners' pending representations (dated 10.09.2025 and 11.09.2025) after hearing all stakeholders and pass a reasoned order within 60 days. The court balanced the petitioners' claim that water is essential and they possess the property against the municipality's objection regarding pending property title disputes in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of West Bengal disposed of the writ petition challenging the Tarakeshwar Municipality's refusal to provide a water connection and holding number, directing the municipality to consider the petitioners' pending representations (dated 10.09.2025 and 11.09.2025) after hearing all stakeholders and pass a reasoned order within 60 days. The court balanced the petitioners' claim that water is essential and they possess the property against the municipality's objection regarding pending property title disputes in civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case